ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic all-inside repair using puncture needle combined with suture hook versus meniscus repair device Fast-Fix for the treatment of meniscal tear in popliteal hiatus region.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed on the clinical data of 48 patients with meniscal tear in popliteal hiatus region admitted to Second People′s Hospital of Fujian Province from January 2014 to December 2017. There were 32 males and 16 females, aged 16-44 years [(28.0±7.8)years]. A total of 25 patients were treated with arthroscopic all-inside repair using puncture needle combined with suture hook (needle-hook group) and 23 patients were treated with meniscus repair device Fast-Fix (Fast-Fix group). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were compared between the two groups. The function of knee joint was evaluated by Lysholm score, Tegner score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score before operation, at 6 months after operation and at the last follow-up. The meniscal healing rate was evaluated by MRI scan at the last follow-up. During the period of follow-up, the incidence of complications (infection, popliteal tendon injury, foreign body irritation, etc.) was compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up for 24-36 months [(25.8±2.5)months]. No significant differences were observed in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (all P>0.05). The preoperative Lysholm score, Tegner score and IKDC score were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). The Lysholm score, Tegner score and IKDC score in needle-hook group were (96.7±3.8)points, (4.3±1.6)points and (95.5±5.4)points at 6 months after operation, significantly higher than those in Fast-Fix group [(93.3±1.6)points, (3.6±0.8)points, (91.9±0.8)points] (all P<0.05). The Lysholm score, Tegner score and IKDC score in needle-hook group were (99.6±1.3)points, (6.1±0.8)points and (99.4±0.2)points at the last follow-up, significantly higher than those in Fast-Fix group [(94.5±1.6)points, (4.8±0.2)points and (97.4±0.5)points] (all P<0.01). The above three scoring systems scored significantly higher in the two groups at 6 months after operation and at the last follow-up than those before operation (all P<0.01). MRI scan showed that the meniscus healing rate in needle-hook group was 92% (23/25) at the last follow-up, higher than 70% (16/23) in Fast-Fix group ( P<0.05). During the period of follow-up, no complication was observed in needle-hook group, but 6 patients [26% (6/23)] in Fast-Fix group had discomfort in the posterolateral muscle of the knee, which was related to popliteal tendon injury or foreign body irritation ( P<0.01). Conclusion:For meniscal tear in popliteal hiatus region, arthroscopic all-inside repair using puncture needle combined with suture hook is superior to meniscus repair device Fast-Fix in aspects of better knee function, higher meniscus healing rate and lower complication rate.
ABSTRACT
The function of the popliteal muscle and tendon in horses remains undescribed. In humans, it is considered a stabilizer of the posterior-lateral region of the knee; its function is closely related to that of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and meniscus. The popliteal tendon (PopT) constitutes the main proximal attachment of the popliteus muscle to the femur, and in humans, insertional variations have been described. Knowledge of anatomical variations is needed for the correct interpretation of diagnostic images and arthroscopic findings. To elucidate further the anatomy of the equine PopT, both hind limbs of 30 horses were dissected. Similar to humans, the equine PopT has 3 variants (types I, II, and III) depending on the number of components forming the tendon. Additionally, the area of insertion varies; the location can be either cranial, underneath, or caudal to the proximal insertion of the LCL. Furthermore, the PopT has a constant attachment to the lateral meniscus. The results of the present study are useful for clinicians working with equine orthopedics, as the tendon and insertional variants could affect the interpretation of diagnostic images and arthroscopic examinations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anatomic Variation , Extremities , Femur , Horses , Knee , Lateral Ligament, Ankle , Menisci, Tibial , Orthopedics , Stifle , TendonsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This paper describes a new anatomic reconstructive surgical procedure that simultaneously reconstructs the fibular collateral ligament, popliteal tendon and popliteofibular ligament using a split Achilles allograft and compares the clinical results of this new technique with the posterolateral corner sling procedure used for posterolateral instability of the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients were treated for a posterolateral instability of the knee between 1998 and 2003. The posterolateral corner sling procedure (Group A) was performed in 25 patients and anatomic reconstructive surgery (Group B) in 21 patients. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. An arthroscopic evaluation was performed in all cases. The clinical review included the Lysholm knee scores as well as a lateral instability and tibial external rotation assessment. RESULTS: The mean Lysholm knee scores in groups A and B were 54.8 points and 54.4 points prior to surgery, and 86.9 and 93.6 points at the time of the latest follow-up, respectively (p<0.05). Tibial external rotation of 5 degrees more than the contralateral uninjured knee was noted in 12% of group A and in 5% of group B (p<0.05). Lateral instability of 5 mm greater than the contralateral knee was observed in 28% of group A and in 14% of group B (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Anatomic reconstruction of the posterolateral corner resulted in less lateral instability and tibial external rotation than did the posterolateral corner sling procedure.